Think like an editor, not a performer
In the 2027 UBS Video Interview for Group Finance, the last prompt gives you control over the final piece of evidence. Most candidates treat it as extra speaking time. A better approach is to audit what the interviewer has heard and make one deliberate addition.
The exact prompt
Use the freedom carefully:
You now have 2 minutes to add any further comments you may have.
What weak closings reveal
- They start without a purpose. The answer becomes a stream of leftover points.
- They retell a full story. Two minutes is too short for another unfocused example.
- They recite qualifications. A list does not show judgment or behavior.
- They add generic enthusiasm. Interest is more credible when linked to evidence.
- They end abruptly. The final sentence should make the addition feel complete.
Run a three-question audit
Ask what you have demonstrated, what remains unproven, and which missing point matters most. Then build a short bridge from evidence to relevance. The response can be well under two minutes if it completes that job.
Imagine a hypothetical candidate who has discussed deadlines, setbacks, and learning but has not shown how they communicate technical information. They could mention turning a complex project analysis into a one-page explanation for non-specialists, checking their understanding, and revising the wording after questions. That addition supplies a distinct signal without claiming facts about UBS.
- List the evidence already covered in earlier answers.
- Select one meaningful gap rather than several minor ones.
- Give one compact example that proves the missing quality.
- End by stating how that quality shapes the way you work.
The final comments should change the evidence set, not merely repeat its conclusion.
Plan all six answers together
This closing question works best when you know what the earlier prompts will cover. OfferTutoring provides the complete questions for UBS Group Finance so you can assign a distinct purpose to each Video Interview response.
